Why should BCCI, State bodies be not governed by National Sports Governance Act, asks Supreme Court


The Supreme Court is dealing with a plea concerning the BCCI since 2014 and several applications are filed in the matter from time to time.

The Supreme Courtroom is coping with a plea in regards to the BCCI since 2014 and several other functions are filed within the matter every so often.
| Picture Credit score: PTI

The Supreme Courtroom has requested the Board of Management for Cricket in India (BCCI) and all of the State cricket associations why they shouldn’t be ruled by the Nationwide Sports activities Governance Act, 2025.

A Bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana noticed this on Tuesday (September 8, 2026) whereas listening to the functions filed by some cricket our bodies within the BCCI matter. The Bench additionally requested the advocates showing for the BCCI and State cricket associations to take directions on why the phrases and circumstances of service of their workplace bearers be not ruled by the 2025 Act which is now in pressure.

The Supreme Courtroom is coping with a plea in regards to the BCCI since 2014 and several other functions are filed within the matter every so often.

The Courtroom had earlier constituted a committee headed by former CJI Justice R.M. Lodha to recommend reform measures, together with framing of a structure for the cash-rich cricket physique.

The Supreme Courtroom had accepted the suggestions made by the committee offering for reforms within the construction, organisation and dealing of the BCCI.

Editorial | Bat for the better: On the BCCI and the RTI Act

In September 2022, the Supreme Courtroom had allowed modification of the BCCI’s structure and mentioned that an workplace bearer can have steady tenure of 12 years which incorporates six years in State affiliation and 6 years in BCCI earlier than the cooling-off interval of three years triggers.

It had mentioned that an workplace bearer can serve on a selected publish for 2 consecutive phrases, each on the BCCI and the State affiliation degree, after which he must serve three years cooling-off interval.

Remark | BCCI monopoly and judicial review

The structure of the BCCI, which was earlier authorized by the Supreme Courtroom, stipulated a compulsory three-year cooling-off interval for anybody who had served two consecutive phrases of three years every within the State cricket affiliation or the BCCI.



Source link