The world’s richest man says his fight against OpenAI and Sam Altman is not over.
“Concerning the OpenAI case, the choose & jury by no means really dominated on the deserves of the case, simply on a calendar technicality,” Elon Musk wrote on X, including he could be interesting the choice to the Ninth Circuit Court docket of Appeals.
On Monday, a jury in Oakland, California, handed a major victory to OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman, by ruling that Musk waited too lengthy to carry his lawsuit, which alleged that the Tesla CEO had been scammed out of his early funding in OpenAI when the nonprofit analysis lab pivoted right into a partial for-profit firm. US District Choose Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, who oversaw the case, rapidly accepted the unanimous verdict.
“There is no such thing as a query to anybody following the case intimately that Altman & Brockman did the truth is enrich themselves by stealing a charity,” Musk wrote. “The one query is WHEN they did it!”
Concerning the OpenAI case, the choose & jury by no means really dominated on the deserves of the case, simply on a calendar technicality.
There is no such thing as a query to anybody following the case intimately that Altman & Brockman did the truth is enrich themselves by stealing a charity. The one query…
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 18, 2026
Musk’s characterization of the statute of limitations as a “technicality” belies the truth that such cut-off dates are a cornerstone of just about all American legislation. Few legal guidelines enable plaintiffs or the federal government a limiteless window to file swimsuit or carry fees.
In a separate tweet, Musk additionally took a swipe at Gonzalez Rogers, although he didn’t establish her by title. He later deleted the tweet.
“This illustrates why the ruling by the horrible activist Oakland choose, who merely used the jury as a fig leaf, creates such a horrible precedent,” he wrote. “She simply handed out a free license to loot charities for those who can preserve the looting quiet for a number of years!”
OpenAI and Altman each confronted the potential of considerable losses if the jury and choose present in Musk’s favor, together with being on the hook for billions in damages, simply because the main AI agency is considered as approaching a public providing. Musk additionally requested that Altman, as soon as an ally, be eliminated as CEO.
Within the trial, Altman’s and OpenAI’s legal professionals confirmed jurors proof they stated proved that Musk knew and supported the corporate’s plans to lift capital by partnering with one other main tech firm, and that he at one level pushed for OpenAI to type a relationship with Tesla. Musk’s lawsuit, the legal professionals argued, was a late try and hobble OpenAI after it had left xAI within the mud. Each Musk and Altman testified during the trial, with the Tesla CEO telling the jury that he did not learn the “nice print” of an OpenAI time period sheet detailing its plan to determine a for-profit entity.
A spokesperson for OpenAI didn’t instantly reply to Enterprise Insider’s request for remark.
